Article Sidebar
Submitted
June 9, 2016
Published
June 9, 2016
Download
Statistic
Read Counter :
737
Download : 765
Main Article Content
Abstract
The freedom of lndoriesian Judges in making decision is still asked at this moment. Judge has the duty to maintain justice. He has to have the freedom to do his duty. Yet, the Indonesian Judge is facing some internal and external problems. In thelegal reasoning of Pragmatis Realism believes that the Judicial decision-making is a creative activity, so it needed a qualified thinking from the judge that can be supported by the high technology.
Judge is not only ascertain and apply the law also must be makers of law. The legal reasoning of Pragmat is Realismis been hoping to make a good solution thatis related to the freedom of Indonesian Judge.
Judge is not only ascertain and apply the law also must be makers of law. The legal reasoning of Pragmat is Realismis been hoping to make a good solution thatis related to the freedom of Indonesian Judge.
Keywords
freedom
maintain justice
decision-making
Article Details
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
Adi, M. K. (2016). Hakim sebagai Pembentuk Hukum dalam Pandangan Pragmatis Realisme bagi Kebebasan Hakim Indonesia dalam Pengambilan Putusan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 6(12), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol6.iss12.art11
