Article Sidebar

Submitted
31 October 2022
Accepted
3 November 2022
Published
3 November 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 217 Download : 411

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membuktikan pengaruh dari integrasi rantai pasokan yang mencakup integrasi internal, integrasi pelanggan, dan integrasi pemasok, terhadap kapabilitas inovasi produk pada UMKM di Indonesia. Penelitian  ini menggunakan data primer yang diambil langsung dari sumber asli yaitu pelaku UMKM di Indonesia yang dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Terdapat 64 responden yang menjadi sample untuk penelitian ini. Data penelitian diolah dengan pendekatan structural equation modellling (SEM) berbasis partial least square (PLS) menggunakan software SmartPLS. Dari hasil olah data tersebut peneliti memperoleh bukti bahwa integrasi pelanggan memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kapabilitas inovasi. Sedangkan integrasi internal dan integrasi pemasok tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kapabilitas inovasi produk.

Keywords

integrasi rantai pasokan integrasi internal integrasi pelanggan integrasi pemasok kapabilitas inovasi produk UMKM

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Zuhal Noor Firmansyah, Anjar Priyono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Firmansyah, Z. N., & Priyono, A. (2022). Pengaruh Integrasi Rantai Pasokan terhadap Kapabilitas Inovasi Produk pada UMKM di Indonesia. Selekta Manajemen: Jurnal Mahasiswa Bisnis & Manajemen, 1(5), 109–120. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/selma/article/view/25965
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aulawi, H. (2018). Improving Innovation Capability Trough Creativity and Knowledge Sharing Behavior. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 434, pp. 012242
  2. Baharanchi S. R. H. (2009). Investigation of the Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Product Innovation and Quality. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16(1), pp. 81- 89.
  3. Chavez, R., Yu, W., Gimenez, C., Fynes, B., & Wiengarten, F. (2015). Customer integration and operational performance: The mediating role of information quality. Decision Support Systems, 80, pp. 83-95.
  4. Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), pp. 101–115.
  5. Didonet, S. R., & Dias, G. (2012). Supply Chain Management Practices as a Support to Innovation in SMEs. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(3), pp. 91-109.
  6. Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21, pp. 1105-1121.
  7. Faems, D., Van Looy, B., Debackere, K. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. J. Prod. Innovat. Manag, 22, pp. 238–250.
  8. Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), pp. 58-71.
  9. Gomes, J.F.S., Weerd-Nederhof, P.C., Pearson, A.W., & Cunha, M.P. (2003). Is more always better? An exploration of the diferential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development. Technovation, 23, pp. 15-191.
  10. Gray, B.J., Matear, S., & Matheson, P.K. (2002). Improving Service Firm Performance. Journal of Service Marketing. 16(3), pp. 186-200.
  11. Hapsari, N. B. (2018). Pengaruh Integrasi Rantai Pasokan Terhadap Kualitas Produk dan Inovasi Produk Pada UKM Kerajinan Pahat Batu Tama Agung Magelang. Other Thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta.
  12. Hillebrand, B., & Biemans, W.G. (2004). Links between internal and external cooperation in product development: An exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, pp. 110-122.
  13. Karabulut, A. T. (2015). Effects of Innovation Strategy on Firm Performance: A Study Conducted on Manufacturing Firms in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, pp. 1338–1347.
  14. Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M. & Jayaram, J. (2005). Internal and external integration for product development: the contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy. Decision Science, 36(1), pp. 97-133.
  15. Lamb, C.W., Hair, J.F., & McDaniel, C. (2011). Marketing. Mason: Cengage learning.
  16. Purnama, C., Wardana. L.W., Rahmah. Y., Fatmah. D., & Rahmah. M. (2020). The Impact of External Integration and Internal Integration to Product Innovation and Competitive Advantage on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 6(4), pp. 82-95.
  17. Reguia, C. (2014). Product innovation and the competitive advantage. European Scientific Journal, 1(1), pp. 140-157.
  18. Rosenzweig, E.D., Roth, A.V., Dean, J.W. (2003). The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 21, pp. 437-456.
  19. Wong, C. W. Y., Wong, C. Y., & Boon-Itt, S. (2013). The combined effects of internal and external supply chain integration on product innovation. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), pp. 566 - 574.
  20. Zhao, L., Huo, B., Sun, L., & Zhao, X. (2013). The impact of supply chain risk on supply chain integration and company performance: a global investigation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(2), pp. 115-131.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>